国产毛片a精品毛-国产毛片黄片-国产毛片久久国产-国产毛片久久精品-青娱乐极品在线-青娱乐精品

查看: 3793|回復(fù): 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[好文賞析] ZT: Bringing government debt under control: how painful will it be?

[復(fù)制鏈接]
跳轉(zhuǎn)到指定樓層
樓主
發(fā)表于 2010-4-28 18:28:04 | 只看該作者 回帖獎(jiǎng)勵(lì) |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
關(guān)鍵詞: Bringing , control , debt , government , painful
Last week I participated in an academics consultant meeting at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve to discuss the question of achieving fiscal sustainability. I have posted the note I wrote for the meeting on my web site, but here is a quick summary of some of the points I made:
1. There is no doubt that governments in advanced economies will have to go through major fiscal policy changes in the coming years to keep the debt-to-GDP ratio under control. Given current policies, debt-to-GDP ratios are likely to explode in some cases to 300 or 400% of GDP over the next decades.

2. The required changes are large. The recovery will bring deficits somehow under control but this goes nowhere in terms of achieving sustainability. Most advanced economies need to find additional revenues (or cut spending) by a large amount, somewhere in between 4 and 10 percentage points of GDP depending on the country -- and this has to happen every year for the foreseeable future (we are talking about many decades here).

3. There is no mystery to what needs to happen: governments need to increase taxes and reduce spending. Both have economic and political consequences and we need to be as smart as we can to choose changes that are efficient and have limited negative consequences on the economy (and growth).

4. Good news: We have seen large adjustments in government debt before so this adjustment is feasible. No need to go to the post-WWII decades, in the 80s and 90s we saw very large reductions in government debt in many advanced economies. We are talking about reducing the debt to GDP ratio by up to 40 percentage points in a short period of time, such as 10 years.

5. Good news (2): Some of these prior adjustments had limited consequences on growth. We normally tend to think about reductions in government spending and increases in taxes as having negative effects on growth but in several of these adjustments, growth accelerated rather than decreased (we refer to these events as "expansionary fiscal consolidations"). And when growth accelerates, this becomes a virtuous cycle as faster GDP growth reduces the debt-to-GDP ratio, generates tax revenues, etc.

6. Expansionary (growth promoting) fiscal consolidations tend to be associated to decreases in spending rather than increases in taxes and they tend to come together with a series of pro-growth reforms in other areas of the economy (Ireland post-1985 is a perfect example of this).

7. So can we hope for a nice, painless, expansionary fiscal consolidation over the next decades? Not obvious. There are several reasons why those experiences might not be easily replicated this time:

- In some countries, government spending levels have come down relative to where they were in the 80s or 90s. It is not easy to produce a significant decrease in government spending without affecting some basic services provided by the government. More so in the US where government spending is low relative to other (European) advanced economies.


- Some of the expansionary fiscal consolidations benefited from falling interest rates. As an example, Belgium reduced government debt by close to 40 percentage points in between 1996 and 2006 but most if not all of the decrease was linked to falling interest rates on government debt. Currently, there is no room for interest rates to go down. If any, they might go up.


- This time, the consolidation needs to take care of the past (the accumulated level of debt) and the future (the fact that projected deficits given current policies will be very large). The adjustment is larger than what was needed in some of those previous expansion.


8. So my guess is that a "painless" fiscal adjustment is unlikely this time. Taxes will have to play a stronger role and governments will need to strike a balance between the need for additional revenues and the potential negative growth effects that higher taxes might have. This balance will require a strong amount of political leadership and consensus.

Antonio Fatás

本版積分規(guī)則

關(guān)于我們  -  服務(wù)條款  -  使用指南  -  站點(diǎn)地圖  -  友情鏈接  -  聯(lián)系我們
電子工程網(wǎng) © 版權(quán)所有   京ICP備16069177號(hào) | 京公網(wǎng)安備11010502021702
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
主站蜘蛛池模板: 香蕉在线精品视频在线观看2 | 美日韩一级 | 向日葵app看片版免费观看 | 欧美大片在线看 | 日韩欧美亚洲视频 | 特级一级毛片免费完整版视频 | 高清中文字幕免费观在线 | 亚洲精品永久免费 | 四虎影院免费视频 | 久久天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁2020 | 大桥未久日韩欧美亚洲国产 | 岛国免费v片在线播放 | a级黄色毛片三个搞一 | 69视频在线观看免费 | 免费一区二区三区免费视频 | 欧美成年网站 | 亚洲自拍偷拍网 | 女人18一级毛片免费观看 | 自拍一区在线 | 青青草国产精品视频 | 亚洲欧美成人影院 | 91性视频| 天堂国产 | 一区二区影院 | 国产在线精品一区二区夜色 | 在线观看亚洲免费视频 | 四虎影视在线影院4hutv | 国产一级做a爰片久久毛片男 | 欧美成人在线免费 | 国产欧美精品国产国产专区 | 欧美激情hd | 在线观看一区二区三区视频 | 亚洲观看视频 | 91热精品| 天天综合网天天做天天受 | 欧美精品超清在线播放 | 欧美亚洲专区 | 99在线在线视频免费视频观看 | 日本久久综合视频 | 国产动漫在线 | 在线观看人成网站深夜免费 |